Publications
Forensic Engineering for First Defenders
Journal Article Title: Forensic Engineering for First Defenders
Article Author(s): Woodson, Robert A., Ph.D., P.E.
Volume: 1
Volume #: 2
Month: December
Year: 1984
Abstract:
Those of us who have been practicing Forensic Engineering for years and years have learned that it is not enough to have ascertained the pertinent facts of a case and to have prepared appropriate Exhibits to present in support of those facts. The Forensic Engineer must have demonstrated credible expertise in pertinent technical areas in order for the Judge or Jury to accept his opinion as authoritative and trustworthy. Moreover, the Forensic Engineer must convince not only the impartial adjudicator, but also the Attorney for the opposition that his "statements of fact" and his conclusions are beyond successful contradiction.
National Academy of Forensic Engineers - President's Message
Journal Article Title: National Academy of Forensic Engineers - President's Message
Article Author(s): COX, WILLIAM A., JR., P.E.
Volume: 2
Volume #: 1
Month: June
Year: 1985
Abstract:
Nineteen hundred and eighty five can be the year for the National Academy of Forensic Engineers to move its activities and influence onward and outward. A firm base of eminently qualified professional forensic engineers has been attained during the administrations of presidents Specter and Pritzker. A sound organizational structure has been put in place. We surely have the dedication to the profession, the experience, and the talents among our superb group of members, who were so meticulously evaluated, to become an effective force in the forensic arena for the public good and the betterment of the profession. Much of the effort of this years' leadership is devoted toward organizing expanded member participation in the affairs of the Academy. The splendid response to the questionnaire survey last December afforded specific identifications of member interests, useful goals and program suggestions and many volunteers of service to help implement them. This member input has been invaluable in the appointment of committees and the drafting of I their initial charges.
Mediation During Construction - To Save Time And Cost
Journal Article Title: Mediation During Construction - To Save Time And Cost
Article Author(s): Ward, Joseph S., P.E.
Volume: 2
Volume #: 1
Month: June
Year: 1985
Abstract:
To avoid longtime delays and associated costs in settling construction disputes, it is proposed that a procedure for mediation during construction be utilized in the construction industry as an alternative to the current litigation process. The mediator, selected by the owner, contractor and architect/engineer, will investigate the dispute immediately after its occurrence and will rapidly make a determination to resolve the matters between the parties while construction is still underway. This proposal has been endorsed by the Association of Soil and Foundation Engineers and is currently under consideration by the Deep Foundation Construction Industry Roundtable. Unfortunately, disputes between the owner, contractor, subcontractor, and architect/engineer arise during the course of construction due to numerous factors. These controversies are frequently concerned with failures, encountering unexpected site conditions, interpretation of the contract documents, or unilateral actions by the owner, contractor or architect/engineer, all of which have an impact on the construction process and frequently cause delays due to the absence of clear-cut resolutions of such problems.
The Subpoena: What Does It Really Mean?
Journal Article Title: The Subpoena: What Does It Really Mean?
Article Author(s): Hohns, H. Murray, P.E.
Volume: 2
Volume #: 1
Month: June
Year: 1985
Abstract:
Everyone who has done a fair amount of forensic work has learned that the ominous subpoena demand to be at a certain place, at definite time, for the giving of testimony as stated in the subpoena is not to be really feared. The demands readily can be rescheduled to suit the needs of those involved in the deposition. Forensic engineers expect to get paid for the deposition and the preparation time. Some jurisdictions provide that the party taking the deposition must pay the expert in advance for the deposition time. In that case, I graciously request and require that payment before 1 start the deposition or I simply get up and leave. The lawyers wrote the rules, thus, they can live by them. There are some variations in deposition procedures from state to state and the experienced engineer should always ask the lawyer client about the rules. Never be ashamed to ask a lawyer what you may feel is a foolish question. Lawyers ask foolish questions all day long in front of their peers and feel no shame. You can do it too.
Page 5 of 110